WARNING: Many of the small-aperture magnitudes for Seyfert nuclei listed in MGT are systematically too faint, due to saturation effects which were worse than we had suspected. The "inner magnitudes" (which refer to a 0.1 arcsecond radius aperture), for some of the brighter Seyfert 2 nuclei in Table 2, and for many of the Seyfert 1 nuclei in Table 1, are too large (i.e. too faint) by anywhere between 0 and 2 magnitudes. In other words, many of them are merely upper limits to the true magnitude. In the paper we mistakenly assumed that stars fainter than 18.0-18.5 were unsaturated in our 500-second PC exposures. However, a comparison with 28 stars measured in both our PC images and in the US Naval Observatory sky survey catalog reveals some substantial disagreements. Even when the magnitude difference between the small aperture (r=0.1 arcsecond) and the larger aperture (r=0.5 arcseconds), equals 0.5 magnitudes--the value for unsaturated point sources-- the stellar magnitude from our PC exposures can still be too faint by more than 1 magnitude (in 14% of the cases). Unfortunately our inner magnitude estimates for saturated Seyfert 1 nuclei, which were based on the unsaturated wings of their PSFs, are also about 1 +/- 1 magnitude fainter than values measured in 10 subsequent PC images having much shorter exposure times. It seems likely that more of this unpredictable error is due to problems with saturation, than with intrinsic time variability of the Seyfert 1 nuclei. Inner magnitudes fainter than 19 are likely to be accurate, as is the case for most of the fainter Seyfert 2 nuclei in Table 2, and nearly all of the non-Seyfert nuclei listed in Table 3. We have confirmed this by finding excellent agreement between our data and photometry of non-Seyfert Markarian galaxies from the literature (e.g. from Huchra). We apologize to any astronomers who might have relied on the accuracy of our Seyfert photometry, and regret that we are unable to come up with a reliable algorithm for correcting the saturation errors.